GROUP+2

**GAMZE ÖZTEKİN**
[|URL of our Test]




 * POST- TEST EVALUATION OF THE TEST**

The activities and tasks were selected in a way that they could fit everyone's interests. ||
 * = CATEGORY ||= ** Assessment Points ** ||= ** COMMENTS ** ||
 * Clarity of Directions / Layout ||= 5 || Students had no difficulties in fully understanding of the instructions given on the test. Paper-based layout was quite clear and enough white space is employed. Computer-based instructions were easy to follow; there were pointers and visual aids that connected one activity to another. ||
 * Cultural Fairness/Relevance ||= 5 || The test was culturally fair and of relevance to all students. It was likely to address all cultures differently. There were no offensive questions.
 * Validity/Reliability ||= 3 || The test actually evaluated most of the information required according to the test specifications. The questions elicited the general skills and knowledge. However, some questions were not appropriate to the test-takers. For instance, the task in which students were expected to write an alternative ending for an existing story included a story that was too long to read in 20 minutes. Therefore, many students experienced difficulty in managing the time for the activity. ||
 * Authenticity/Washback ||= 5 || The test items represented were quite authentic and meaningful for the context. They were highly relevance to teaching and learning, and they are designed to measure test-takers' creativity and critical thinking skills. Especially in writing part, the second task was Interpretation of a famous quote which explicitly encouraged students to think and make logical inferences while formulating their ideas. ||
 * Practicality / media ||= 4 || The test was accurate and easily administered.The students complete the task adequately in given time.Also the test provides a variety of media and input. ||
 * Scoring/Interpretation ||= 3 || There were a few problematic questions while scoring the test but generally it was easy to score. The evalution of the responses lacked some specificity but but in general provided enough data to reach an objective interpretation of the results according to the purpose of the test as set out in the test design statement. ||
 * = TOTAL || 25 ||  ||